Exit forum › ID Forum Discussion › Psoas Mass
This topic contains 2 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by William Brady, DC June 19, 2018 at 1:59 pm.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 15, 2018 at 5:54 pm #5373
Andrew WengertParticipant30 year old female. Consistent R sided low back and right anterior and lateral hip pain when back gets really bad. Currently an achy dull 2/10 but gets up to a sharp stabbing 9/10. Provocative is lumbar extension, also abdominal training, and sitting for 3+ hours hip flexion after leg day is also painful. Palliative is laying on her stomach and child’s pose.
Patient has had this pain for 9 years.
All level one tests are 100% with the exception of QLF which is 60% 11112. SLPF also brings on tension in the right side of the low back and right posterior thigh, patient can touch the floor.
Patient came to me with an MRI and a neurosurgical referral.
MRI findings:
At L2-3 there is a large right sided cystic mass within the right psoas muscle measuring 5×4.5x3cm and protrudes into the right L2 neural foramen. Radiologist believes this is a psoas abscess, and states that a cystic neural tumor would be extremely rare.
Patient went for neuro consult today and neurosurgeon ordered an MRI with contrast to better visualize the mass he believes it is a cystic schwannoma. She follows up with him next week after the imaging and he has put the option of surgery clearly on the table.
The MRI also shows an L4-5 annular bulge.
Diagnosis at this point:
1-Right psoas mass causing L2 foramen crowding
2-Adhesion in bilateral multifidus, Longissimus muscles
3-L4-5 annular bulge
My question is, “Is now the right time for my treatment?”
Using reverse compatibility some data points go toward disc and some go toward this mass. So I feel treatment is warranted at this time even though it likely wont effect the priority problem.
June 16, 2018 at 8:37 am #5374
Christopher StepienParticipantI agree, your smoking gun here appears to be the cystic mass (disc pain tends to be more episodic and less consistent, esp. over 9 year period) . If it’s your #1 priority in your diagnosis, any treatment for #2 and #3 could distract the patient from attending to #1.
I wouldn’t treat her yet.
If she gets #1 resolved, it’s like teeing up the golf ball perfectly so that when you do deliver treatment, you’ll get her better as quickly and permanently as possible (thus becoming a better referring patient). You’ll also know exactly how much of her problem was caused by the cyst because hopefully, her symptoms will be relieved by some %.
I’m curious, she’s provoked by lumbar extension (weight-bearing) and relieved by laying prone (no gravity). Both put her spine in extension. I assume lumbar extension provokes her at the end range and not in the first 25% of motion (suggesting more disc involvement in this test)?
If the pain is provoked in the 1st 25% of motion, I’d prioritize adhesion a bit higher on the list (although not higher than the cyst) because the same spinal orientation expressed different symptoms in weight-bearing vs. not weight-bearing.
June 19, 2018 at 1:59 pm #5375
William Brady, DCParticipantThat is a very large mass. Do not let her get distracted. No treatment at this time. Continue with neurosurgeon.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.